It’s time to set the record straight about Rams’ season-ending playoff loss
We’ve heard all offseason from fans and pundits alike that the Los Angeles Rams were simply “a drive away” from taking down the eventual Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles.
I wouldn’t ordinarily look so far back in the rearview mirror, especially with training camp underway; however, this single game is being incorrectly used as a barometer for predicting LA’s success in 2025. Instead of wiping the slate clean and rolling the ball back up the hill, many are gauging the Rams’ incremental improvements and using this lone drive as the measuring stick.
It’s preposterous.
According to ESPN Analytics’ measure of win probability, the Eagles were firmly in the driver’s seat for the entire game. The Rams never reached 50% likelihood.
A few important shifts within this matchup:
ESPN’s analytics take into account that—even if the Rams scored a touchdown on their final offensive possession—the Eagles would only need a field goal to steal away victory. Sure, the Rams defense had the Eagle’s number for most of the second half; however, you’d take those odds in the postseason when the margins are ever-slim.
To pretend the Rams were only a drive away fails to acknowledge that Philadelphia dominated in terms of win probability for most of this game.
The snowy conditions were tough, certainly. However, all offseason Stafford has been universally praised for his playoff effort in Philadelphia. Advanced metrics simply do not support this take.
The divisional round was easily one of Stafford’s worst performances over the 2024 season. By Pro Football Focus (PFF) offensive grading only, this was tied for the veteran’s fifth-worst outing of the year.
Stafford’s four turnover-worthy plays marked his season-high total, tied with Week 9 at the Seattle Seahawks. The box score is favorable in this regard as Stafford threw zero interceptions and only lost a single fumble. It...